05:04:07 The TAR Brescia issue orders of suspension provevdimento REVOCATION datta 22.12.2006 issued by the Superintendent in mentioning in previous posts. Oh and how can 'have happened??
And what are the reasons ...... and' the usual thing Italian justice ... strong with the weak and weak in strength?
Do not be fooled this time the Court did not do anything ..... THE BLAME 'THE SOPRINTENZA?
And why '? He was not playing well?
AAHI AAHI AAHI! careful attention ................. ............. stateattenti
undertaken before the REVOCATION of any administrative measure, and it has' expression of a fundamental principle laid down by our legal system that grants in the present cases and that the counterparty may have a specific right of reply through comments and memories in will be able to defend and justify their behavior according to the administration and in contrast to riolevato many rules 'the need' to revoke the authorization measure.
In this case the administration was prosecuting the Superintendent in the quality 'of the body responsible for the protection of the bond landscape.
But then one wonders why 'the Regional Administrative Court accepted the appeal by the developer??
Perche'la and office were '"forgot" to send a binding recommendations which informed the initiation rite of the preliminary investigation which must be informed of the commit just to give him a chance' to defend themselves ......
lawyer advocate of action mome and on behalf of clients has whined for 18 pages (applies eighteen) telling us in a thousand different ways to do just volume pages of an action that was already 'taken for granted and start winning it found a "procedural error" that renders null and / or cancel appointments by the revocation action taken.
In fact, the lawyer and the client is 'arrabattato nonpoco, about 18 pages (applies eighteen) simplicissimo describing the "errors" committed by the Superintendent that he had left his client a chance' to defend himself, writing and wanting to appear it's almost like the breaking .............. statements before decapitation. Crafty!
In practice and 'the same supervisors you with his error allowed the suspension by the TAR of the measure of Brescia WITHDRAWAL clearance paesaggitico effectively allowing a restart of work .........................
BUT WE ARE SURE THAT 'YOUR WAY'??
PHOTOGRAPHY IN MAY 'NOTE WELL THE EFFECT OF THE MEASURE
AU GINIMEX Srl
And what are the reasons ...... and' the usual thing Italian justice ... strong with the weak and weak in strength?
Do not be fooled this time the Court did not do anything ..... THE BLAME 'THE SOPRINTENZA?
And why '? He was not playing well?
AAHI AAHI AAHI! careful attention ................. ............. stateattenti
undertaken before the REVOCATION of any administrative measure, and it has' expression of a fundamental principle laid down by our legal system that grants in the present cases and that the counterparty may have a specific right of reply through comments and memories in will be able to defend and justify their behavior according to the administration and in contrast to riolevato many rules 'the need' to revoke the authorization measure.
In this case the administration was prosecuting the Superintendent in the quality 'of the body responsible for the protection of the bond landscape.
But then one wonders why 'the Regional Administrative Court accepted the appeal by the developer??
Perche'la and office were '"forgot" to send a binding recommendations which informed the initiation rite of the preliminary investigation which must be informed of the commit just to give him a chance' to defend themselves ......
lawyer advocate of action mome and on behalf of clients has whined for 18 pages (applies eighteen) telling us in a thousand different ways to do just volume pages of an action that was already 'taken for granted and start winning it found a "procedural error" that renders null and / or cancel appointments by the revocation action taken.
In fact, the lawyer and the client is 'arrabattato nonpoco, about 18 pages (applies eighteen) simplicissimo describing the "errors" committed by the Superintendent that he had left his client a chance' to defend himself, writing and wanting to appear it's almost like the breaking .............. statements before decapitation. Crafty!
In practice and 'the same supervisors you with his error allowed the suspension by the TAR of the measure of Brescia WITHDRAWAL clearance paesaggitico effectively allowing a restart of work .........................
BUT WE ARE SURE THAT 'YOUR WAY'??
PHOTOGRAPHY IN MAY 'NOTE WELL THE EFFECT OF THE MEASURE
AU GINIMEX Srl
0 comments:
Post a Comment